Tag Archives: california

Churches in California and Arizona help start-up firm distribute discounted food

Before members of the congregation began arriving to pick up the prepaid boxes of food, the Rev. Bruce Jackson, associate pastor of Bayview Baptist Church in San Diego, asked volunteers involved in the distribution process to join hands for a prayer circle. Arizona – United States – California – Business and Economy – Southwest Continue reading

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Start-Up Looks to Match Mac Lovers

For Mel Sampat, Apple’s 600,000 orders for its latest iPhone represent a huge business opportunity. Sampat is the founder of Cupidtino , a newly launched dating website for Apple fanboys and girls – and one that denies registration to anyone who doesn’t visit the site via Safari on an Apple device. This isn’t just to keep out the PC hoi polloi – it’s to keep the demographics pure for advertising. (Cupidtino, for the record, is a mashup of Cupid and Cupertino, the northern California city in which Apple is based.) The idea for the site came to Sampat, a former Microsoft employee, during an argument with his girlfriend about whether he should use his iPad during dinner. He told her that if they ever split up he’d date a fellow Apple aficionado. (His girlfriend had a Zune when they met; his first present to her was an iPod.) Then he thought about how to connect with Miss Mac. “The more I thought about it, the more I realized people that are true Apple fans might actually have a lot more in common than they realize,” Sampat told the Associated Press . And so Cupidtino – which describes itself as “a beautiful new dating site” – was born, linking people who share “personalities, creative professions, a similar sense of style and aesthetics, taste, and of course a love for technology,” plus an affection for Coldplay and Starbucks. (Yes, the site actually lists those last two.) Think perhaps Sampat has been staring lovingly at his iPad for a little too long? Apparently he’s not the only one. The site generated 12,000 sign-ups after its first two days of being live (and in beta) in May. On Wednesday, the site began charging $4.95 per month – or in the words of the site, which clearly knows its audience: “Our membership costs the same as a [Starbucks] venti Mocha but lasts longer than 20 oz.” The site doesn’t ask members compatibility questions about religion (presumably because the answer is Apple) or desire for kids. Instead it focuses on the size of your iTunes playlist or what’s in your Netflix queue. According to a not-exhaustive count from datingsitereviews.com, there are some 50 microniche dating websites (think veggiedate.com), but Sampat, for one, has no illusions about competing with giants like Match.com. “It will likely be more casual and our demographic might be a little younger as well,” he told the Wall Street Journal . The site has received “tens of thousands of dollars” in private funding, he said, plus an offer via e-mail from the San Francisco Apple store’s business development team to help with “any technology needs.” (The e-mail noted that the offer was not an official endorsement.) That bodes well for Sampat’s dream of Cupidtino events at Apple stores or product discounts. (To read how one online dating entrepreneur hit the big time, click here .) Will Cupidtino feel the love from customers? Let the arrow-watch begin. Apple – Microsoft – IPhone – IPad – Wall Street Journal Continue reading

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How to Make More Manufacturers

At the age of 53, after years of working as a developer for a large software firm, Karen Snyders was ready to be her own boss. Her idea was to create a product she had long coveted but been unable to locate: beautifully crafted knitting supplies made from sustainable bamboo. Snyders sensed her designs would be a hit. The question was where to find the equipment and tools needed to bring them to life. She wound up at TechShop in Menlo Park, California. Founded by Jim Newton four years ago as a kind of playground in which do-it-yourself geeks and hobbyists could mess around with cool machine tools, TechShop has become a de facto incubator for an astounding array of start-ups. Cash-strapped inventors have used the shop’s lathes, laser cutters, welding equipment, 3-D printers, and shop tools to make prototypes for projects that include green computer-cooling and drip-irrigation systems, technical scuba gear, and low-cost infant warmers for developing countries. “Previously, the funding needed for serious tools was an enormous impediment to innovation,” says TechShop’s CEO, Mark Hatch, a former Kinko’s executive. “Advances in computer-aided manufacturing software and an 80 percent drop in the price of machine tools over the past two decades have completely changed the economics of starting up in the hardware space.” TechShop members pay just $100 a month. That was well within Snyders’s budget. She took a class on how to use TechShop’s laser cutter and developed some prototypes, and she now has her own business, Karatstix. “TechShop was really key to me doing this,” Snyders says. “If I had seen the machine and how much it was without using and testing it, I just would have given up.” TechShop has 650 members in Menlo Park; 150 at a second location in Raleigh, North Carolina; and 300 signed up for a San Francisco branch scheduled to open this summer. A San Jose, California, shop will open this fall, and TechShop is considering teaming up with co-working group The Hub and commercial developer Forest City to build clusters of entrepreneurs and artists in Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C. The U.S. Department of Commerce has approached the company about opening branches in Detroit and other economically distressed cities. Shared spaces like TechShop’s can fuel the creation of all kinds of companies. In San Francisco’s largely Hispanic Mission District, for example, a nonprofit called La Cocina is helping would-be food entrepreneurs make the jump from home-based businesses to true commercial enterprises. In the five years it has been operating, La Cocina has worked with about 100 clients, 90 percent of them women, all low income by the standards of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. La Cocina clients go through a rigorous application process before starting a six-month preincubation period, during which they work on marketing, product, and operations issues and carefully study the feasibility of their proposed businesses. After that, the focus shifts to finding financing — most businesses need less than $2,000 to start up, says the program’s executive director, Caleb Zigas — and getting access to markets. Clients also get access to a commercial kitchen at below-market rates. “I would be in a completely different place if not for La Cocina,” says Jill Litwin. A graphic artist transplanted from the East Coast, Litwin was La Cocina’s first client when she came in with the idea for Peas of Mind, a line of healthy frozen kids’ food. The program helped connect her with legal assistance, a food scientist, and eventually a factory to expand production. Litwin now has two employees, and Peas of Mind products can be found in supermarkets nationwide. Last year, the company closed a round of equity financing to help it expand again. Bottom Line Plenty of Americans have the desire to make actual stuff, not just software. What they lack are the tools. Entrepreneurship Education for All The Immigrant Advantage Finding the Bill Gates of Sixth Grade How Incubators Speed the Start-up Process How to Make More Manufacturers Student Loan Breaks for Entrepreneurs A Tax Cut for Angels How Business-Plan Competitions Reward Innovation Cutting Incorporation Bureaucracy An Energy Policy for Entrepreneurs Why It’s Time to Revamp the SBIR How States Can Attract Venture Capital Government Data for Entrepreneurs Why We Need More Funding for Big Science Stop Enforcing Noncompetes Why Microfinancing Works TechShop – Business – United States – San Francisco – California Continue reading

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Return of the IPO

The IPO market, moribund for nearly two years, is finally warming up. From January to May of this year, 52 companies sold shares in the public market for the first time, compared with only eight in the same period last year. Another 106 companies intend to go public later this year. But there are some important differences this time out. The speculative froth is clearly out of the market, with investors demanding much lower prices than in previous waves of IPOs. The good news for entrepreneurs is that an increasing number of investors are favoring venture-backed fast-growing start-ups over the more established but highly leveraged companies that had been in vogue, says Kathleen Smith, co-founder of Renaissance Capital, an IPO research firm. That’s why today’s crop of IPOs looks a lot like the universe of Inc. 500 companies — fast-growing tech businesses, a smattering of financial services firms, and a few entertainment and consumer companies. Here are five promising up-and-comers that are hoping to go public this year: REALD If you saw Avatar on the big screen, then you have used a RealD product. Co-founders Michael Lewis and Joshua Greer made a bet on 3-D after working together in Creative Artists Agency’s digital media lab. The Beverly Hills company licenses proprietary 3-D technology for use in games, movies, and consumer electronics. Last year, its technology was used in films that accounted for 75 percent of the total domestic 3-D box-office receipts. But it also faces big-name competition from Dolby, IMAX, and others. Skeptics aren’t certain RealD can repeat the huge boost the company enjoyed from Avatar, which helped push the company’s revenue to $189 million for the fiscal year ending March 26, 2010, up from $45 million in 2009, a 324 percent growth rate. Hoping to raise: $200 million BECEEM COMMUNICATIONS The Santa Clara, California, company designs and develops 4G chips for the next generation of mobile wireless devices. In 2009, the company shipped more than 2.5 million chips designed with WiMax, one of two technologies vying to become the standard for 4G. It is also developing chips using LTE, the other G4 technology. Revenue jumped 214 percent, from $14 million to $44 million, in 2009, but the market is competitive, and one customer, Motorola, makes up 51 percent of the company’s sales. Hoping to raise: $100 million QLIK TECHNOLOGIES Big corporate clients such as Qualcomm and Kraft use analytics software from Qlik Technologies to visualize data such as sales trends and cash flow. Qlik, headquartered in Radnor, Pennsylvania, got an early edge in business intelligence software with in-memory technology, which processes data from a computer’s memory rather than from disk storage. But as more software makers adopt in-memory technology, the company may have trouble maintaining its 33 percent growth rate. Hoping to raise: $100 million GAMEFLY Sean Spector and Jung Suh couldn’t find an online video game rental service. So, in 2002, they co-founded, with Toby Lenk, what is often called the Netflix of video games. The Los Angeles company is backed by Sequoia Capital, which also invested in Apple, Oracle, and YouTube. Gamefly, the largest video game rental service in the U.S., had revenue of $85 million in 2009. The company rents its 7,000 titles to more than 380,000 subscribers. But Blockbuster and Netflix have signaled interest in the market. Hoping to raise: $50 million ZIPCAR Membership for Zipcar’s swipe-and-go car-sharing service is more than 400,000 strong. Scott Griffith, a former Boeing executive, signed on as CEO in 2003, but the company has continued to lose money. Some of the IPO’s proceeds will go toward paying down the company’s debt. Still, Zipcar has the lead in the market for car sharing in North America, which could grow to $3 billion by 2016, according to one estimate. Hoping to raise: $75 million Sequoia Capital – WiMax – Initial public offering – Business – YouTube Continue reading

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Revitalizing the American Dream

We need more start-ups. A lot more of them. New companies mean new ideas, new approaches, new products and services, and new jobs. What’s more, in the wake of the Wall Street meltdown and the catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a wave of start-ups could spark a new sense of optimism about what businesses can actually accomplish — something else this country sorely needs. We are not just talking about the fast-growing “gazelle” companies that expand at double-digit rates — though we could certainly use more of them. Nor is this solely about sparking, say, a green business boom or the creation of more tech companies or a bunch of cool new iPhone apps — though we like all of those, too. Instead, what we are seeking is a kind of rebooting of the entrepreneurial ideal — the notion that starting a company is a viable option for all Americans, regardless of where they come from. This country has long been a haven for entrepreneurs. Ten years into the 21st century, it’s time to rethink exactly what that means. Given our anemic and largely jobless economic recovery, this is more important than ever. Young companies — those younger than six years old — provide the bulk of new jobs; in 2007, they accounted for 64 percent of them, according to a 2009 survey by the Kauffman Foundation that looked at start-up formation since the 1970s. John Haltiwanger, an economist at the University of Maryland, came to a similar conclusion in a more recent study: His research found that start-ups account for only 3 percent of total U.S. employment but almost 20 percent of gross job creation. Unfortunately, creating new companies is easier said than done. The rate of business creation has remained stubbornly constant over the years. Since the early 1990s, the number of start-ups has hovered at about 500,000 a year, according to a survey by the Kauffman Foundation. This has been the case during booms and busts, whether taxes were rising or falling, and whether venture capitalists were irrationally exuberant or largely recalcitrant. Clearly, some new thinking is required. That’s what Inc. aims to provide in the pages that follow. We spent months talking to economists, entrepreneurs, academics, politicians, and policymakers about what can be done to spark a renaissance of American entrepreneurship. What we ended up with was a game plan to help revitalize the American economy. This is not just a matter for elected officials. Sure, issues such as immigration and tax policy need to be addressed. But we also need action by schools, corporations, nonprofits, investors, and entrepreneurs themselves. The good news is that you don’t have to look too hard to find approaches that work. Indeed, we discovered an entire infrastructure of programs, policies, and ideas designed to stimulate business formation. These programs need to be studied, emulated, fine-tuned, and scaled. And their leaders need to be acknowledged and brought into the national conversation about the economy. Step 1: Take Entrepreneurship Out of the Business Schools Arts and humanities and science students need entrepreneurship education every bit as much as b-schoolers. Universities as diverse as MIT and the University of Miami have created model programs for training students in the fundamentals of business formation. More programs like these should be created. Read more Step 2: Tap the Best and the Brightest Wherever They May Be Entrepreneurs from all over the world want to start companies in the United States. Our immigration policy should reflect that, by offering short-term visas to would-be entrepreneurs who are in the country on H-1B or student visas. If those visa holders create companies that create jobs, then we should offer them green cards. Read more Step 3: Our Education System Should Foster Entrepreneurship Among the Young Putting ideas into action may be the biggest challenge for entrepreneurs. Teaching youngster–especially middle-school students–how to start businesses is one of the best investments we can make. Programs such as the National Foundation for Teaching Entrepreneurship offer a good model; educators should also take small steps such as adding the biographies of great entrepreneurs to the standard curriculum. Read more Step 4: Speed the Start-up Process Most start-ups don’t need much money to get started. But that doesn’t mean they don’t need help. That’s where incubators and seed accelerators such as Y Combinator in San Francisco and TechStars in Boulder, Colorado, come into play. Investors, entrepreneurs, and city officials across the country should jump on the bandwagon. Read more Step 5: Give Manufacturers the Tools They Need to Get Started Plenty of Americans have the desire to make actual stuff, not just software. What they often lack are the tools to get their ideas off the ground. Shared manufacturing spaces such as TechShop in Menlo Park, California, can provide aspiring manufacturers with access to sophisticated prototyping equipment. We need more of these facilities. Read more Step 6: Cut College Graduates Some Slack The rising level of student-loan debt among recent college graduates may well inhibit them from starting businesses, driving grads into stable corporate jobs that will allow them to pay down their loans. The government should find a way to let college graduates who start businesses postpone loan payments for a few years while they get their ventures off the ground. Read more Step 7: Give Angel Investors a Tax Break A number of states including Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Ohio, offer angel investors a tax credit for backing early-stage ventures. More states should follow their lead, and so should the federal government. As Stephen Spinelli, co-founder of Jiiffy Lube, observes: “If I get an immediate tax credit, I get an immediate return. I know I would increase my investing if there was a tax credit.” Read more Step 8: Reward Innovation Through Business-Plan Competitions A revved-up contest economy will harness the competitive spirit to launch a wave of businesses. Programs such as New York City’s NYCApps and the nonprofit X prize should be expanded and encouraged. Read more Step 9: Cut the Incorporation Red Tape In New Zealand, an entrepreneur can register a business with one filing and be legal and legit in one day; in the U.S., it takes about six steps and six days. We need to make it easier for founders to register their start-ups. Hawaii’s approach, which involves an online step-by-step guide to registering a new business, should be adopted across the country. Read more Step 10: Pass an Energy Bill, Already Markets–and investors and entrepreneurs–abhor uncertainty. So let’s get serious about the emerging energy economy by creating an actual energy policy. Only then will companies be able to make informed investment decisions. Read more Step 11: Revamp the SBIR The Small Business Innovaton Research Program is a good idea that unfortunately supports a small number of companies that seem to excel only at getting SBIR grant money. The government should revamp the agency’s mission so that it provides seed capital and contracting opportunities to younger companies, and not just small companies. While we’re at it, let’s rename it the New Business Innovation Research Program. Read more Step 12: Grow Local Investment Communities at the State Level It’s foolish to try to duplicate Silicon Valley, but smart governments can do a lot to lure investors to their states. Since 1993, for example, New Mexico has committed funds to venture-capital firms with the requirement that they open an office in New Mexico and pledge that investments equaling the amount provided by the state were made in state. The results have been encouraging, and suggest that other states should nurture local VCs. Read more Step 13: Bring Government into the 21st Century Government entities have more resources–generally in the form of data–than officials realize. They need to follow San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom’s lead and hand that raw material over to entrepreneurs. Read more Step 14: Fund Big Science As a percentage of gross domestic product, funding for scientific research has dropped from 2003 levels. What’s more, the federal contribution to R&D is now below 1 percent of GDP, a commonly accepted minimum goal for economically developed countries. Meanwhile, our global economic competitors are seizing the opportunity. We should reverse course, and fast. Read more Step 15: Stop Enforcing Noncompetes Midcareer executives are a rich source of entrepreneurial talent. But studies indicate that in states and in industries where noncompete agreements are commonly enforced, workers are forced to make career detours, finding their next positions outside the industry in which they had expertise. Noncompetes make it hard for people to start companies, and hard for start-ups to attract seasoned talent. Let’s follow California’s lead and stop enforcing noncompetes nationwide. Read more Step 16: Bank the Unbankable With Microfinancing Over the past few years, many mainstream banks have beefed up loan requirements or significantly cut back on small-business lending. Nonprofit microfinance lenders have come to play an ever more important role in bridging the funding gap. Cities and states should embrace these kinds of programs. Businesses that seem unbankable are often anything but–if you know what to look for. Read more It’s difficult, if not impossible, to say how many new companies Inc.’s 16-point plan would help create. We went over our proposals and performed some back-of-the-envelope calculations and estimate that implementing these ideas would spur the formation of at least 300,000 additional start-ups over the next decade or so. The number, we admit, is speculative. But blue-sky thinking is fine with us. The point is that the old models are no longer working. We need bold thinking about how a new wave of entrepreneurship can transform the American economy, spark innovation, and provide new jobs, new vibrancy, and new opportunities. That’s where you come in. What do you think of our plan? Is there anything missing? What do you think needs to happen to make this country more start-up friendly? We want to hear from you. Please post a comment below. United States – Business – Venture capital – Entrepreneur – Education Continue reading

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Complete Rules of Entrepreneurship

Each day, Inc.’s reporters scour the Web for the most important and interesting news to entrepreneurs. Here’s what we found today. Entrepreneurs, defined. Merriam-Webster defines an entrepreneur as “one who organizes, manages, and assumes the risks of a business or enterprise;” however, Business Insider columnist James Altucher believes this definition is inadequate. Altucher, who has started, invested in, and advised dozens of businesses, has created his own definitive 100 rules for being an entrepreneur. Most of the rules on this comprehensive list address the initial challenges of launching a new business—but some rules also apply to those larger, more stable, companies as well. Which rules do you follow? What’s missing from the list? Let us know below. Is the start-up bubble just “blubble?” That’s the word Michael Arrington is using, at least. In a TechCrunch piece published this weekend, Arrington asserts that the state of the start-up world is a far-cry from the 1999 to 2000 years of cash and burn. “This isn’t a bubble,” he writes. “It’s more like a Blubble. A blubble? Yes, a blubble. Because there is a lot of whining going on.” Arrington asserts that start-ups 11 years ago were encouraged to raise hundreds of millions in venture capital and spend it on anything remotely useful, while today’s start-ups are much leaner. High valuations on Facebook and Twitter have stoked the “bubble” buzz, he says, but start-ups are hardly raising enough funds to start using the B-word officially. Well, most start-ups at least. “Absolutely no one is telling start-ups to raise and spend money as fast as they can. With the possible exception of Color. I have no idea what those guys are up to over there in crazy picture-sharing land.” Happy employees work here. In the mist of a gradual economic recovery, how do you retain employees? Fortune highlights the best practices from three companies that made this year’s 100 Best Companies to Work For list: Zappos, DreamWorks Animation, and Teach for America. Some of the perks include a live-and-work-from-anywhere policy, free dry-cleaning, meals and medical care on campus, and the ability of veto hiring decisions if a job candidate doesn’t fit the company culture. One recruiting manager, Christa Foley, says: “We’re looking for people who don’t take themselves too seriously.” The company she works for interviews job candidates in rooms with weird names, such as an Oprah-style talk show set where candidates sit on a couch next to their HR host. The stalemate is over. Twitter is staying in San Francisco, the company announced on its blog Friday, the New York Times reports . The news puts to rest a months-long stand-off over during which Twitter threatened to leave its home by the bay, and officials debated whether Twitter should be allowed to benefit from a special tax exemption to San Francisco’s only-in-the-state payroll tax. In order to take the break, Twitter is moving into a district of the Central Market neighborhood newly zoned as payroll-tax-exempt. When? “We don’t yet have a timeline for our relocation, but we expect we will move into our new space in mid-2012. We can’t wait,” Sean Garrett posted for Twitter. What’s yet to be seen is how the city reacts to similar relocation threats from other local, growing tech companies such as Zynga. Redmond rethinks employee comp. In an effort to keep from employees from departing for start-ups, Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer has unveiled new rules governing employee pay, according to an internal company memo published by GeekWire. The retooled compensation scheme would raise base salaries while reducing deferred compensation awarded in the form of stock. In addition, Microsoft’s performance-rating system will be retooled, and special consideration will be paid to “early and mid-level R&D, mid-level company-wide and certain geographies,” the memo says. In a post titled “What Microsoft CEO Ballmer Gets Wrong About Employee Compensation,” Mogulite’s Amy Tennery observes a.) the shout-out for oft-maligned middle managers is surprising; and b.) “For the less-stock-more-cash strategy to be a boon to employees, Microsoft shares would need to decline significantly over time.” Big gains for tablets predicted. When the iPad was introduced a year ago, critics complained it was simply a bigger version of the iPhone—without the actual ability to make a phone call. The iPad and its competitors have since proven themselves highly useful both for consumer and for commercial use. Goldman Sachs forecasts tablets will account for 17 percent of all wireless data demand by 2020, as reported by All Things Digital this morning. Smartphones remain far more prevalent than their larger counterparts (they can make phone calls after all), but this data proves tablets are fast becoming less a luxury and more a necessity for consumer and commercial use. Marketing begins at home. Sure, customers research large purchases, such as electronics or automobiles, before heading to the store or showroom. Research shows that “coming out of the recession, consumers are more scrupulous about researching their everyday products such as diapers and detergent, too,” the Wall Street Journal reports . More than one-fifth of consumers research food and beverage purchases online, one-third research pet products, and nearly 40 percent research baby products, data from consulting firm WSL Strategic Retail shows. Is this an early knell for the end of flashy in-store shelf displays and aisle-end promotions? Not necessarily, but it does mean retail stores and brands are boosting their investments in reaching consumers online first, including on social media. Eighty-three percent of consumer-product companies say they plan to increase their investments in shopper marketing over the next three years, according to a Booz & Co. survey. Are you a winner? Eager to learn more about the ins-and-outs of social media and how to apply them to your business? An American Express-sponsored Facebook contest could land you (and four other small companies) a trip to Facebook’s offices in Palo Alto, California, as well as $2,500 in Facebook ad credits and a $20,000 check, ReadWriteWeb reports. How can you enroll? Why the AmEx OPEN Facebook page, of course. More from Inc. magazine: Get this delivered to your inbox. Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Tumblr. Like us on Facebook. Continue reading

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off